This Article Was First Published on TurkishNY Radio.
The UK’s latest move on stablecoin regulation is met with both warm welcomes and mixed feelings from the digital-asset industry.
The Bank of England (BoE) has just released a consultation on the way it would regulate sterling-denominated stablecoins, as we continue to see movement in the regulation of UK stablecoins.
Yet many in the industry argue that the regime is still too onerous and could put Britain at a disadvantage.
UK Stablecoin Regulation: What the New Rules Mean
The consultation paper, published on 10 November 2025, outlines the main building blocks of the systemic stablecoin framework.
Recognized issuers of sterling-denominated stablecoins would be confronted with a cocktail of tough conditions, including the composition of the assets against which they must be backed, limits on holdings, and capital requirements.
Distracting, to say the least, is the possibility of secular stagnation What if there was a real danger that nominal short-term rates would become negative by the end of 2017 as a central bank lowers rates and ends up with big excess reserves?
BoE currently permits issuers to hold 60% of their reserves in bills, with at least 40% inside the bank not remunerated! The consultation makes clear that only those stablecoins widely used for payments in the UK are considered to be ‘systemic.’
Caps Raise Eyebrows in Crypto Industry
One of the most contentious measures in the Bank of England stablecoin proposals is the temporary imposition of limits on holdings.
Under the regime, people could hold no more than £20,000 in recognized sterling-denominated stablecoins at a time, while businesses would be restricted to £10 million.
Industry insiders say these limits will clash with global norms and jeopardize the UK’s allure as a jurisdiction for stablecoin creation. A crypto commenter wrote on Reddit:
“A £20k cap for the rest of us? Why do they think they should dictate to us where to invest our money?”
The UK should focus on facilitating the issuance and payments of stablecoins, not imposing less efficient limits that will send users abroad, according to critics.
Backing-Asset Rules
The new UK framework on stablecoin regulation marks a departure from the BoE’s previous suggestion of applying 100% unremunerated central bank deposits.
Systemic issuers may not hold 50% of their backing assets in the deposits at the bank but 60% of it in short-term government debt and just a maximum of 40% in deposits at the bank.
In this transitional period, companies that are identified at the start as systemic will be allowed to invest in government debt up to 95%.
Despite this welcomed flexibility, solicitors point out that the overall regime is still much more heavy-handed than the non-systemic rules controlled by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
Joint Oversight and Ongoing Consultation
Under the systemic stablecoin regime, the Bank will regulate prudential and financial-stability risks for recognized issuers, whereas the FCA remains responsible for supervision of conduct aspects.
The consultation is available until the 10th of February 2026, at which point the BoE and HM Treasury will publish Codes of Practice to set out how these arrangements would be fully implemented.
A Step Forward, but There’s Still a Lot to Correct
Is workable The banking sector claims positive industry feedback to the Bank of England’s stablecoin proposals, notably moving away from its 2023 discussion paper.
But to many parties, the UK stablecoin regulation still values risk reduction over growth and competitiveness.
“The holding limits being in place is definitely going to make pound-denominated stablecoins less competitive.”
said one fintech legal head.
One other further noted that the mechanics of enforcing tracking of individual holdings and cross-platform flow are not clear.
Strategic Implications for the UK
At a time when other jurisdictions such as the US and EU are storming ahead to embrace stablecoin and digital-money frameworks, how the UK treats UK stablecoin regulation could make or break London’s future as a financial innovation hub.
Lawyers say the timeline and clarity of the regime will be critical; projects could flee to more certain jurisdictions if implementation is delayed or oversight muddled.
What’s Next in the Rulebook for Stablecoins
The upcoming scheduled milestones in the sterling stablecoin regime are consultation, coding, and licensing. Issuers and payment companies will be eyeing carefully the moment when HM Treasury designates a coin as systemic, a move that triggers the BoE’s full regime.
DTAP The degree to which the Bank can move at pace to create a workable authorization process will determine how UK stablecoin legislation translates into real-life issuance, payments activity, and cross-border flows.
In summary, the UK’s stablecoin regime has unearthed a credible, detailed model, but the industry’s impression of the Bank of England stablecoin proposals is one that is both promising and constrictive.
The architecture for sterling-denominated stablecoins is now laid; what remains to be determined, however, is whether the regime will permit scalable issuance or ultimately stabilize.
Summary
The BoE’s most recent proposals for UK stablecoin regulation detail close supervision over sterling-pegged stablecoins, including caps on holdings and requirements for backing assets.
While the framework represents a step forward for a regulated system, the restrictions around who can own and how much owners can hold could be a barrier to adoption and competitive challenges, industry players say.
Legal and policy experts point to enforcement difficulties, opaque systemic thresholds, and fears that slow regulation could drive stablecoin issuers offshore.
Glossary of Key Terms
Sterling-Denominated Stablecoin
A stablecoin directly pegged to the British pound sterling. The artist can be utilized in payment systems in the UK, and the Bank of England operates unique rules about usage.
Systemic Stablecoin Regime
A regulatory framework when the principal concern is that the stablecoin is being widely utilized for payment purposes, and its usage may be a source of risk for financial stability. It requires rigorous supervision, reserves, and operational standards to be maintained.
Backing Assets
The reserves that are retained by the issuer of a stablecoin to guarantee the token’s value. Pan’s systemic issuers will have to keep a certain amount of government debt and central bank deposits.
Holding Limits
A temporary cap imposed on the upper limit on how much business or a customer may retain on a statutory stablecoin. The measure is intended to avoid rapid deposit movement to and from traditional banks.
Financial Conduct Authority
The UK’s conduct regulator for non-systemic stablecoins. Crypto-asset holders’ consumer protection, market stability, and compliance are regulated by the UK.
Prudential Oversight
The regulation applies a systemic stablecoin as a novel agent to safeguard the broader economy’s housing and management. Pan BOE oversight applies to the systemic as well as the issuer.
HM Treasury
The UK government department in charge of financial affairs. HMT’s conclusion on which stablecoin is systemic will activate the regime at the Bank of England.
FAQs About UK stablecoin regulation
Why is the UK introducing new stablecoin regulation?
The rules aim to mitigate the financial-stability risks through the supervision of systemic stablecoin issuers, establishing a minimum reserve requirement and authorizing authority for payments relied on across the wider UK economy.
What do the recommended holding limits mean for stablecoin users like you and me?
The BoE proposes a cap of £20,000 per person and £10 million per firm (but the caps are temporary), adding restrictions on usage that could drive some users toward other non-sterling stablecoins.
What are the benefits of the new backing-asset requirements for stablecoin issuers?
Issuers receive confirmation of reserve composition, are authorized to hold short-term UK government debt, and have the ability to maintain liquidity options with proper measures put in place to safeguard payment system stability.
What are the obstacles for stablecoin firms to implement?
Firms could find it difficult to track holding caps, editorial reserve approval, and the challenge of being dual-regulated by the BoE and FCA, in particular when systemic thresholds remain undefined or licensing timescales.
