This article was first published on TurkishNY Radio.
Bitcoin dominated the headlines in 2025, including a push to $126,000 in October and a later retreat that reminded markets that volatility never retired. Yet the year’s real progress happened off the front page. Crypto’s plumbing improved: safer custody expectations, clearer rules, better settlement rails, and a market structure driven by flows.
A Security Shock That Reset Priorities
Security was the first wake-up call. On February 21, $1.5 billion was stolen from Bybit, and U.S. authorities attributed the theft to North Korea. The incident reinforced that “infrastructure” is not only blockchains. It is also approvals, key management, employee access, and the operational discipline that prevents a single mistake from becoming a systemic loss.
Regulation then changed shape as in late February, the SEC filed to dismiss its case against Coinbase, and in May, it dismissed its civil lawsuit against Binance. That pivot mattered because it reduced the constant legal overhang on U.S. exchanges and the institutions that trade through them, letting compliance teams plan around rules instead of rumors.
Stablecoins Grew Up When the Rulebook Arrived
The biggest settlement upgrade arrived on July 18, when the GENIUS Act was signed into law, setting a U.S. framework for payment stablecoins and requiring reserve backing and ongoing disclosures. Stablecoins are the dollar layer inside crypto. When reserves and transparency standards improve, liquidity is easier to trust, counterparties are easier to evaluate, and payment firms have fewer reasons to keep stablecoins at arm’s length.
On the protocol side, Ethereum activated its Pectra upgrade on May 7, part of the long grind toward smoother operations. These upgrades rarely deliver instant hype, yet they reduce friction for builders and validators, which is how networks become dependable infrastructure.
ETFs Became the New Liquidity Engine
Then came the new market rails: ETFs. In early October, global crypto ETFs drew a record $5.95 billion in weekly inflows as bitcoin hit new highs. In November, the same pipe showed its downside when BlackRock’s flagship spot bitcoin ETF saw a record one-day outflow of roughly $523 million during a broader selloff. 2025 made one point to miss. Price still swings, but the swing increasingly travels through measurable channels.
That is why the year’s key indicators were mostly infrastructure indicators. ETF flows mapped institutional demand. Stablecoin reserve disclosures offered a clearer view of on-chain dollar liquidity. Funding rates and open interest highlighted when leverage was getting crowded, while network fees and throughput helped separate real usage from noise.
Conclusion
Crypto did not become risk-free in 2025. It became more legible. Between a stablecoin rulebook, a flow-driven ETF market, protocol upgrades, and harsher lessons on operational security, the ecosystem ended the year better built for mainstream participation than it began.
FAQs
Why did infrastructure matter more than price in 2025?
Infrastructure determined who could participate and how safely. ETFs broadened regulated access, stablecoin rules improved settlement trust, and enforcement shifts reduced existential uncertainty for major platforms.
Did ETFs reduce bitcoin volatility?
ETFs improved access, but they also made repositioning faster. The record inflow week and the record outflow day in 2025 showed that the same channel can amplify both rallies and selloffs.
What were the most useful indicators to watch?
ETF flows, stablecoin reserve transparency, funding rates, open interest, and network fees offered a cleaner read on liquidity and leverage than price alone.
Glossary of Key Terms
ETF flows: Net money moving into or out of crypto exchange-traded funds, often used as a proxy for institutional demand.
Stablecoin reserves: Liquid assets backing a dollar-pegged token and supporting redemptions at par, with disclosure requirements under U.S. law.
Funding rate: The periodic payment in perpetual futures that signals whether leveraged positioning is skewed long or short.
Open interest: The total size of outstanding derivatives positions, used to estimate how much leverage sits in the market.
References
