This article was first published on TurkishNY Radio.
A new stablecoin can grow quietly for months, then one data point lands and everything feels louder. That is what happened with USD1 stablecoin after recent on-chain analysis and reporting suggested that roughly 87% of the token’s circulating supply is sitting on a single major exchange, equal to about $4.7B out of an estimated $5.4B in circulation.
On paper, a stablecoin is meant to be the calm corner of the market, the tool people use when they want to pause risk, settle trades, or move dollars across venues. In practice, distribution matters almost as much as reserves. When supply concentrates, the stablecoin starts to behave less like a broad payment rail and more like inventory parked in one warehouse.
What the concentration says about the USD1 stablecoin structure
A stablecoin float that lives across many wallets, networks, and platforms tends to absorb shocks better. A float that piles into one venue can look healthy in calm conditions, then turn fragile during a disruption. The reason is simple: stablecoins do not only live on-chain, they live inside the plumbing of exchanges, banking rails, and redemption channels.
The supply concentration is also striking because the USD1 stablecoin has been positioned as a product designed for institutional scale and cross-border settlement, with backing described as cash and cash equivalents and the promise of redeemability at $1.
When the majority of tokens sit in one place, the market starts asking whether the distribution is actually broadening, or whether the early use case is dominated by a single liquidity hub.
There is context for why that hub relationship matters. A prior public discussion tied USD1 to a high-profile transaction narrative involving an Abu Dhabi-backed entity and a major exchange, which helped place USD1 in the institutional conversation early.
USD1 stablecoin concentration and the real risk traders track
If the peg stays near $1.00, some readers will shrug and move on. That is understandable, but it misses the point. The story is not only the peg. The story is how the market behaves when the peg is tested.
With USD1 stablecoin heavily concentrated, three practical risks become more relevant than usual.
The first is liquidity risk disguised as liquidity strength. If most supply is already on one venue, the market can look deep because inventory is close to the order book. Yet, if that venue changes risk settings, tightens access, or faces regional restrictions, liquidity can vanish faster than expected for everyone outside that center.
The second is redemption pathway risk. Even if reserves exist and redemptions are technically supported, the ease of converting stablecoins back to dollars depends on operational channels. When the majority of supply sits on one venue, that venue’s policies and counterparties become part of the stablecoin’s risk profile.
The third is market influence risk. No voting token is needed for influence to form. If one venue hosts most of the float, it can shape spreads, fees, and flows. It becomes the default place where price discovery happens, even though the stablecoin is supposed to be neutral infrastructure.
The indicators that matter right now
For readers who want a clean dashboard to follow, a few indicators usually tell the truth.
Price parity across venues is the first. A stablecoin that stays near $1.00 everywhere is healthier than one that holds $1.00 only where its supply is concentrated. The market should watch for persistent discounts away from the dominant venue, because those gaps often show stress early.
Supply distribution is the second. The most important trend is whether the share held on one venue declines over time as the token spreads into more wallets, more chains, and more payment paths. If distribution does not broaden, the concentration risk remains baked in.
Reserve transparency is the third. Public statements describe backing in cash and cash equivalents, plus periodic reporting and proof-of-reserves style disclosures. The clearer the breakdown and the more consistent the cadence, the easier it is for the market to price risk without relying on speculation.
Finally, on-chain flow patterns should be watched. Large transfers into the dominant venue can signal that USD1 stablecoin demand is primarily trading and treasury positioning, not organic payments or multi-venue usage. Research notes have highlighted large movements into exchange deposit addresses in the past, which is the kind of pattern traders will keep tracking.
Conclusion
The takeaway is not that USD1 stablecoin is doomed, or that the peg must break. The takeaway is that structure matters. If close to 87% of the supply is effectively parked on one venue, then the stablecoin’s resilience depends heavily on that venue’s continuity, access, and operational stability.
If distribution broadens over time, USD1 stablecoin can start to look like neutral infrastructure. If it does not, the market will keep treating it like a stablecoin with a single point of gravity, and that changes how serious participants price risk.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does 87% concentration mean for holders?
It means most tokens appear to be held through one venue, so venue-related disruptions can affect liquidity and access more than usual.
Does concentration mean the peg will fail?
No. It means the token can be more sensitive to operational and regulatory events tied to the dominant venue.
What should market observers track weekly?
Cross-venue price parity, the share of supply held on the dominant venue, reserve reporting quality, and large on-chain inflows and outflows.
Glossary of key terms
Peg: The target price relationship, designed to stay near $1.00.
Redemption: Converting the stablecoin back into fiat value through supported channels.
Liquidity: How easily an asset can be traded without large price impact.
Cash equivalents: Highly liquid instruments, often including short-term government securities, used to back stablecoins.
Concentration risk: Risk that increases when supply or activity is heavily located in one place.
Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice.
Sources
