Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, turned the dial to a greater level of criticism on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, saying that the agency is ignoring an important court ruling in which the XRP coin was classified as non-security. This came in the wake of the lawsuit filed by Bitnomial Exchange against the SEC, challenging the power of the regulator to place authority over XRP futures contracts. This lawsuit, therefore, becomes a point of illustration for the mounting tension between crypto companies and the SEC, many arguing that the latter overexercises its role in regulation.
Criticism of SEC Overreach
As stated by Garlinghouse in the latest statements, it is clear that he believes the SEC is overreaching in their actions toward Ripple and XRP. His remarks were due to the lawsuit filed by Bitnomial, in which they say the SEC has no jurisdiction over XRP futures and that these should be conducted specifically by the CFTC. In a X social media post, Garlinghouse wrote: “A new low for a renegade agency many thought couldn’t sink further. The SEC now believes it can operate above the law, ignoring a court’s ruling that XRP isn’t a security.” He then promised to closely monitor the situation and explore potential options that would call the SEC out for what he deemed unlawful overreach.
The basis will be attacking the supposed shared oversight exerted over XRP futures contracts by the SEC. In its argument, the exchange believes that XRP futures should not be classified under the purview of the SEC since it ascribes that these contracts are not securities. This is aligned with what Garlinghouse says regarding the continuous over-reach of the SEC into regulating, which he believed hampers innovation and progress within the cryptocurrency space.
Ripple’s Ongoing Legal Battles
Indeed, Ripple itself has been litigating against the SEC since last December. The agency sued Ripple for selling $1.3 billion of XRP through unregistered securities offerings. Throughout the case, Ripple maintained that XRP was not a security position, largely validated in July 2023 when District Judge Analisa Torres held that the programmatic sales of XRP on public exchanges do not constitute transactions of securities. She decreed that direct sales of XRP to institutional investors can indeed be seen as security transactions, but ambiguity still pervades the regulatory horizon.
The SEC has filed an appeal against the ruling of the judge, and Ripple responded with a cross-appeal. These are some of the ongoing battles between the SEC and the growing field of cryptocurrencies over who will wield the powers of regulation. The battles have often resulted in rather vocal and persistent criticism from the chief legal officer at Ripple, Stuart Alderoty, and his team, as they seem to perceive overreach in the behaviour of the SEC and constitutional implications over its scope in exercising regulatory power.
Industry Reactions and Calls for Clarity
The attacks Garlinghouse has launched on the SEC ring many in the cryptocurrency community, which holds not only that the agency’s measures run against the interests of innovation but also are symptomatic of a broader struggle for regulatory clarity in the sector. To what extent the outcome of these legal battles determines how digital assets are regulated in the United States remains to be seen, seeing as cryptocurrency markets are expected to continue evolving over the course of time.
The problem is further compounded by the fact that the SEC and the CFTC take a somewhat different view towards the classification of digital assets. While the SEC insists on the regulation of security, the view of the CFTC often comes out differently; it usually treats some cryptocurrency contracts as commodities. This disjointed regulatory landscape confused businesses into crypto and prompted calls for clearer guidance from the regulators.
Recently, Garlinghouse’s comments added a new layer of importance since Ripple and most other cryptocurrency companies are wading in choppy waters with regulatory updates. Legal battles that are already ongoing can determine more than the future of Ripple and XRP. In the meanwhile, the natural and keen interest will be from stakeholders and observers within the industry as the legal battles continue between crypto firms and regulatory agencies, such as the SEC.
Stay connected with TurkishNY Radio by following us on Twitter and LinkedIn, and join our Telegram channel for more news.
